FYI

Choose a Language

Powered by Squarespace

Like to Read? Try Listening too!!

Download and Listen to any Audiobook for only $7.49. Save 50% for 3 months on over 60,000 Titles.

Social Media

 

 

Search

Shaun Dawson

Create Your Badge

 

Ever Listen to a Book?

Try Audible Now and Get A Free Audiobook Download with a 14 Day Trial. Choose from over 60,000 Titles.

Want the Latest News??
Traffic Monitor

 

Donations Accepted & Appreciated

Entries in Internet (11)

Monday
Mar242008

Best of Youtube 2007

Have you ever heard of Youtube? In Jan. 2008, of the 9.8 billion videos viewed in the US, 3.4 billion were seen on Youtube. It accounted for one out of every three online videos (34.4%).

Some Youtube Stats for Jan. 2008:

  • 80 million viewers

  • 3.4 billion videos watched

  • 109 minutes per person per month

  • 150,000+ videos uploaded daily


It would take 412.3 years to view all the videos available on Youtube.

80% of all videos posted on Youtube are user generated (amateur) videos.....and Youtube has just announced the 2007 Youtube video awards. There were 12 categories:


Category................................................Winner

Adorable..........................Laughing Baby
Comedy..................................The Mysterious Ticking Noise
Commentary........................Lonelygirl15 is Dead
Creative.................................Human Tetris
Eyewitness...........................Battle at Kruger
Inspirational......................Blind Painter
Instructional......................Rubik's Cube
Music......................................Chocolate Rain
Politics...................................Stop the Clash of Civilizations
Series......................................The Guild - Episode 1
Short Film............................My Name is Lisa
Sports.....................................Balloon Bowl

I personally like the following two videos the best. User generated content is really great!!!


[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXXm696UbKY&eurl=http://id842bnj-a.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=http://contests.labpixies.com/gadget/ytva/gadget_winners.xml&synd=labpixie]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiRHyzjb5SI&eurl=http://id842bnj-a.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=http://contests.labpixies.com/gadget/ytva/gadget_winners.xml&synd=labpixie]

 


Add to Technorati Favorites

Wednesday
Nov282007

Internet Love Triangle Turns Deadly

This is one of those stories that you just can't make up. Thomas Montgomery is a 46-year-old married father of two girls (aged 12 and 14). He gets involved with an 18-year-old girl on the Internet named Jessi. Thomas lies to Jessi and says he is an 18-year-old marine named Tommy who is about to go off to Iraq. Thomas also created another alias for himself as Tom Sr so that Jessi could pass messages and packages through him (Tom Sr) to Tommy in Iraq. The two "young people" continue to chat and get to know each other better. Tommy sends her a picture of a young marine, claiming it was him. Jessi sends Tommy a picture of herself as a beautiful young blond. Tommy falls in love with Jessi. Jessi falls in love with Tommy. Tommy proposed marriage and Jessi accepted. He sent her poinsettias, and she sent him G-strings and dog tags engraved with the message TOM & JESSI ALWAYS & FOREVER.

In the meantime Thomas' wife Cindy becomes suspicious of her husband's online activities. She eventually finds some of Jessi's mementos and unravels the truth. Cindy's marriage might not have been the happiest, but contending with the layers of deceit she uncovered — not to mention a teenager's lingerie — was too much:
"What I cannot believe is that you are living out some bizarre fantasy — as father and son," she wrote in a note to her husband. "If you want to separate — We can... but to continue to lie to me & the kids while she is sending 'your son' gifts in the mail is not acceptable."

The couple stayed in the same house, though Montgomery complained to a coworker about being consigned to the basement. As a mother, however, Cindy felt she had to do something for Jessi. She wrote a letter, enclosing a recent photo of her family.
"Let me introduce you to these people," she said, describing her husband, Tom, her daughters, 12 and 14 years old, and herself. " There was no son, she told Jessi, only her husband, a 46-year-old former marine. "From what I am pulling from your letters you are much closer to [my daughter's] age than mine let alone Tom's," Cindy wrote. "Are you over the age of 18? In this alone, he can be prosecuted as a child predator." Adding that Jessi could be her own daughter, Cindy offered some maternal advice: "Do not trust words on a computer."

For most people that would have been the end of the story.........But in this case the story has just begun!!

Jessithomas-montgomery-and-brian-barrett.jpg didn't know who to believe. Was there no Tommy? Or had Cindy invented the story because she wanted Tommy for herself? Jessi found a friend Montgomery had mentioned, Brian Barrett, a 22-year-old student at Buffalo State College who worked part-time with Montgomery and played poker with him. When Barrett confirmed his friend's trickery, Jessi was devastated. How could her "everything," as she referred to Tommy, be a nothing? She turned to Barrett for solace.

Their conversations quickly turned intimate. Soon, in public forums online, she and Barrett called Montgomery a child predator and taunted him. Montgomery was furious. "Half the company" thought he was a "fucking loser and predator," he IM'd Jessi. Parents no longer trusted him with their kids. His life was so destroyed that he appeared to be contemplating suicide. "U can say goodbye forever to me and Tommy," he told Jessi.

Despite her own anger, Jessi couldn't turn her back completely on Montgomery. He was all that remained of her lost Tommy, after all. Jessi promised Montgomery she would stop talking to Barrett, saying she took up with him mainly to get revenge. As it turns out Jessi lied. She continued to talk to Barrett. She seemed torn between the two men. Eventually, Montgomery found out that Jessi and Barrett were talking again. He was furious.
Later that evening, September 13, 2006 at 10:16 pm, Barrett punched out of work and walked to his white pickup truck in the parking lot. He swung open the door of his truck, settling into his seat. Three shots pierced the driver's side window, and Barrett slumped sideways. He'd been shot in the neck and upper arm by what police believe was a .30-caliber carbine rifle.

When detectives later examined Barrett's cell phone, they found Jessi's number. Lieutenant Ron Kenyon called her in the middle of the night to confirm that she'd had an online relationship with Montgomery and to warn her that she might be in danger. He then sent a message to her local police department in West Virginia, requesting that a cop go to Jessi's home at the address she'd given him.

Officer J. L. Kirk arrived the next morning at a dingy white house next to an automotive-parts dealer. But Jessi wasn't there. Her mother, Mary, said that the teenager was away and that she had no way to contact her. Kirk reported back to Kenyon, who insisted that he'd just spoken to Jessi a few hours earlier and that she had to be in the house. Kirk continued questioning Mary, whose manner struck him as strange. The more he pressed, the more nervous she got until she finally "came clean," as Kirk put it.
She was the woman Kenyon had spoken to. In fact, she was the woman Barrett had fallen so hard for. And yes, Mary was the woman Montgomery may have killed for. She'd used her daughter's identity to beguile the two men.

Back in Buffalo, Kenyon couldn't believe that the Jessi he'd talked to was really her mother. "She was very convincing," he said. "She sounded like an 18-year-old girl to me." He drove to West Virginia to see the truth himself — that the lithe 18-year-old blond of Barrett's and Montgomery's fantasies was a plump 45-year-old married mother of two with short brown hair.

When questioned, Mary said she joined Pogo a few years ago to relax and kill some time. It was only after she paid for the membership, however, that she realized she'd used Jessi's screen name. Mary was directed to a teen room, and she never bothered to correct the mistake. She didn't intend for her many admirers to fall in love with her. Nor did she fall in love with any of them; she says she is happily married to her husband of 23 years. Brian was a "sweetheart" and when he initiated the flirtation, she didn't know how to discourage it without revealing her true identity. Tommy, she said, "was a child who needed someone to show him they cared."
On November 27, 2006, police arrested Thomas Montgomery on murder charges.

At the trial Prosecutor Frank Sedita argued for the maximum sentence of 25 years, describing Montgomery's "almost predatory" pursuit of the woman and his resentment of Barrett when she cooled to Montgomery's advances after 1 1/2 years and thousands of pages of Internet chats.
"My wife and I don't understand how this could happen, how such evil could walk the Earth," Barrett's father, Daniel, said at the sentencing hearing. "To gun down a boy over simple jealousy does not make sense to us."

Montgomery's lawyer said fantasy and reality blurred for the then-married father of two teenage daughters, who was involved in his church and was president of his daughters' swim club. Montgomery, now divorced, attempted suicide in his jail cell after his arrest. He chose not to speak at his sentencing.
"Until September 2006, this was a man who held his head high," attorney John Nuchereno said. "By September 2006 — call it an obsession, call it an addiction, call it what you want — he was suffering from a diminished capacity of some sort."

48-year-old Thomas Montgomery, entangled in an Internet love triangle built largely on lies, was sentenced to 20 years in prison for killing his rival for the affection of a woman he had never met.

 


Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday
Jun112007

Privacy International Blasts Google


Privacy Ranking of Internet Service Companies


 


Google has received Privacy International's worst privacy rating. According to PI, Google is accused of "comprehensive consumer surveillance and entrenched hostility to privacy." Google ranked the lowest among 22 other high profile Internet companies that include: Microsoft, Yahoo!, AOL, Wikipedia, The BBC and others.

Privacy International (PI) is a human rights group formed in 1990 as a watchdog on surveillance and privacy invasions by governments and corporations. PI is based in London, England, and has an office in Washington, D.C. PI has conducted campaigns and research throughout the world on issues ranging from wiretapping and national security, to ID cards, video surveillance, data matching, medical privacy, and freedom of information and expression. In a statement PI said:
While a number of other Internet companies have troubling policies, none comes as close to Google to "achieving status as an endemic threat to privacy"

To see the report in its entirety click here.


To see how each company was ranked click here.


The categories used for analysis included: Corporate administrative details, Corporate leadership, Data collection and processing, Data retention, Openness and Transparency, Responsiveness, Ethical compass, Customer and User control, Fair gateways and authentication, Privacy enhancing innovations and Privacy invasive innovations.

Google of course took issue with the report and defended its record saying that it aggressively defends its users' privacy and stands behind its track record. It was last year that Google successfully fought a subpoena from the Department of Justice trying to review millions of search requests. Other search engines like Yahoo! and AOL handed their records over to the Government but Google refused, took the DOJ to court, and won.
"We are disappointed with Privacy International's report, which is based on numerous inaccuracies and misunderstandings about our services," said Nicole Wong, Google's deputy general counsel.

"It's a shame that Privacy International decided to publish its report before we had an opportunity to discuss our privacy practices with them."

PI claimed they contacted Google before publishing their report but did not receive a response from the company. This is not the first time that PI has tackled Google over privacy issues. In 2004 they filed complaints in 16 different countries against Google's Gmail service claiming among other things:


  • Inadequacy, unfairness and lack of safeguards or redress in the Gmail Terms of Use.

  • An absence of contractual commitment to the security of data.

  • Breaches of law concerning the interception and scanning of emails



Prior to issuing the current report there seemed to be some "cloak and dagger" activity going on behind the scenes. Google had apparently tried to show that there was bias towards Microsoft, and presumably against Google, at Privacy International which prompted PI to publish an open letter to Google denying this saying they were "a fiercely independent organization that has never shown fear nor favour."

As stated in a previous article Is Google Big Brother? there are serious privacy concerns that need to be addressed by Google. The report by Privacy International highlights this. Google has detailed personal information on millions of people who use their various services. How is this data being used? Is it safe and secure? Who has access to it? If there are inaccuracies, how would I know? How long is it kept for? It is not comforting to learn that privacy is not a top priority at Google.

Another aspect to Google brought out in the report is that it tried to undermine the integrity of PI, claiming favoritism towards Microsoft. Instead of dealing with the facts in the report it tried to marginalize the source. Is this the kind of behavior that we can expect from a company whose motto is: Don't Be Evil? Is this the way to deal with criticism? Have others been silenced? There is a saying: "Power corrupts....." Let's hope we are not at the stage that we have to start wondering: "What is Google up to?"

 


 


Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday
Jun042007

Is Google Big Brother?


 


sergey-brin-2.jpg google.jpglarry-page.jpg


For a company that didn't exist 10 years ago Google has come a long way. It is the most pervasive entity on the Internet. If you have ever used a computer, Google knows something about you. It has even coined a phrase that everyone understands: "To google". If you want to find out something about a particular topic, all you have to do is google it, meaning of course to search for it online. Google is a search engine, Google provides a host of services including email, video sharing, book searching, mapping and many business and consumer tools but most importantly Google is an advertising company. Advertising is how Google makes its money. Google has perfected the art of delivering the right ads to the right people at the right time. That is the power of Google.

Birth of a Giant


Google was co-founded by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were students at Stanford University, and the company was first incorporated as a privately held company on September 7, 1998. Google's initial public offering (IPO) took place on August 19, 2004, raising $1.67 billion, making it worth $23 billion. At that time each share was worth $85. Today each share is worth about $500. Both Larry Page and Sergey Brin are worth more than $16 billion each. On March 30, 2006, less than two years after its IPO Google was added to the S&P 500 index.

 


Growth by Acquisition


Google now employs more than 12,000 people with an annual revenue in 2006 of more than $10 billion. For more financial information and statistics click here. Since Sept 2001 it has acquired more than 40 companies, most of them for undisclosed sums. There are however some notable purchases on record.




  • April 2003 - Applied Semantics - Advertising technology - $102 million

  • Jan. 2006 - dMarc Broadcasting - Radio advertising - $102 million

  • Nov. 2006 - uTube - Video sharing - $1.65 billion

  • Dec. 2006 - Endoxon - Mapping technology - $28 million

  • Feb 2007 - Adscape - Video game advertising - $23 million


The proposed purchase of DoubleClick an online advertising company for $3.1 billion has not yet been approved. The recent acquisition of FeedBurner for an estimated $100 million also puts Google in the RSS feed business.

Is Google Big Brother?


"Big Brother" — any omnipresent, seemingly benevolent figure representing oppressive control over individual(s) exerted by an authoritarian power....... from wikipedia


Google's motto is "Don't be Evil" but its ubiquitous presence on the Internet is near monopolistic and history has shown that monopolies, whether government-sponsored or private enterprise do not have a good track record. The fact of the matter is that we "trust" Google and Google knows an awful lot about us. It has just recently offered a new service that brings this into focus called "Web History". Below is part of the promo for this new service.


  • Follow interesting trends in your web activity.

  • Which sites do you visit frequently? How many searches did you do between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.? Web History can tell you about these and other interesting trends on your web activity. Want to learn more? Try the Web History Help page.


This proves, and Google readily admits, that your every search and web page visit has been recorded and stored on their system for future use. As of December 2006, Google is the most used search engine on the web with a 50.8% market share, ahead of Yahoo! (23.6%) and Windows Live Search (8.4%). Google indexes billions of Web pages, so that users can search for the information they desire, through the use of keywords and operators.

Although Google has a clearly defined privacy policy, have you ever read it? Do you know what kind of personal information is collected about you, how it is used and what your options are? Take a look at some of the highlights here. Some of it may surprise you.

 


 


Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday
Apr082007

Sex on the Net II

Here are some more selected stories with a sexual twist collected from various Internet sources.

  • Firefighter dons bikini for a stroll in the park

  • Steven S. Colesteven-cole.jpg, a 46-year-old volunteer firefighter, was arrested Tuesday after police received a report that an intoxicated man was walking and driving around Heritage Oak Park in Mason. Police said Cole was wearing a blond wig, pink flip-flops and a red-black-and-white striped bikini with the top filled out by tan water balloons. Cole's blood-alcohol test registered 0.174, more than twice Ohio's legal driving limit of 0.08, the arrest report said. "He is obviously humiliated and embarrassed by the entire situation," said Cole's lawyer, Charlie Rittgers, who added that he is investigating the circumstances that led to the arrest.


  • Pregnant Woman Accused of Selling Sex

  • Diana Cornwell, 34, craigs-list.pngand her husband, Jesse, 32, each face prostitution charges, Anne Arundel County police said. Diana who is seven months pregnant is accused of using an Internet ad service to solicit money for sex.
    "She advertised that she was pregnant and married," and she did so with her husband's knowledge, said Cpl. Sara Schriver, a police spokeswoman. "I have not heard of this before."

    According to police, Cornwell posted an ad on craigslist.org, an Internet classified ad service, in which she offered sex for $300. An undercover officer made an appointment, and Jesse Cornwell greeted the officer at the door of their Pasadena home. Jesse Cornwell knew the officer was there for sex with his wife, police said. Diana Cornwell was charged with prostitution, scheduling an act of prostitution and operating a house of prostitution. Her husband was charged with the latter two offenses.


  • The Big Metal Penis Festival

  • Recently heldpenis-fest.jpg was the Kanamara festival in Kawasaki city, which basically involves a lot people parading a giant pink penis around the town. Otherwise known as the “big metal penis festival,” the event is traditionally a celebration of fertility. Among those in attendance were couples hoping for children, bemused locals, and a fair few transvestites.

    Surely the most hedonistic hi-jinks you'll ever find on a weekend afternoon, it takes place at the Wakamiya Hachimangu shrine, near Kawasaki Daishi station. The jaw-dropping festivities include old folks carving phallic symbols out of daikon, giant wooden members that you can sit astride and hug for good luck, and stands selling willy-shaped lollipops and hot dogs. Live bands and traditional dancing and drumming performances add to the celebratory air, and the event culminates in a parade around town featuring three shlong-shaped portable shrines. This is the sort of demented behavior you'd get into deep trouble for at school, but here, anything goes.


  • Sex in the 1700's

  • Prostitutes, corset-18th-century.jpgperversions and public scandals – the stuff of the 21st century tabloids was familiar to readers three centuries earlier, according to new research from the University of Leeds. The reading of erotic literature was already a social activity 300 years ago.

    Jenny Skipp’s three-year PhD study examined, catalogued and categorised every known erotic text published in eighteenth-century Britain: "I tried to get a grip on just how many were published, detail the various types of sexual behaviour portrayed and find out who was doing what – and to whom." It proved a surprisingly rich field: "Most people have heard of Fanny Hill, but there was a huge amount of erotic literature published in the 18th century."

    Despite earlier work suggesting that these texts were only for solitary consumption – at home, alone, and behind closed doors – Skipp’s work throws up a surprising image of how these works were used.
    "They would be read in public – everywhere from London's rough-and-ready alehouses to the city’s thriving coffee houses, which weren't quite the focus of polite society in the way we sometimes think," she explained. "Some texts even came as questions and answers and were clearly intended for groups of men to read together, with one asking the questions and the others answering them."


 


Add to Technorati Favorites